↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

The mutational load in natural populations is significantly affected by high primary rates of retroposition

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
The mutational load in natural populations is significantly affected by high primary rates of retroposition
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2021
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2013043118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenyu Zhang, Chen Xie, Kristian Ullrich, Yong E. Zhang, Diethard Tautz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 31%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 27%
Mathematics 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2022.
All research outputs
#565,774
of 25,885,956 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#9,775
of 103,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,590
of 539,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#264
of 1,090 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,885,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 539,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,090 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.