↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Article Metrics

Embed badge What is this page?

A field-based quantitative analysis of sublethal effects of air pollution on pollinators

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
81 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
247 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary News Blogs Twitter Facebook Dimensions citations
Title
A field-based quantitative analysis of sublethal effects of air pollution on pollinators
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2020
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2009074117
Pubmed ID
32778582
Authors

Geetha G. Thimmegowda, Susan Mullen, Katie Sottilare, Ankit Sharma, Saptashi Soham Mohanta, Axel Brockmann, Perundurai S. Dhandapany, Shannon B. Olsson

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 247 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 127 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 17%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Master 14 11%
Other 7 6%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 28 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 9%
Environmental Science 12 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 7%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 33 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 841. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2023.
All research outputs
#18,262
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#570
of 99,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#880
of 399,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#27
of 1,092 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,092 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences the United States of America.