| Title |
A field-based quantitative analysis of sublethal effects of air pollution on pollinators
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2009074117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Geetha G Thimmegowda, Susan Mullen, Katie Sottilare, Ankit Sharma, Rishika Mohanta, Axel Brockmann, Perundurai S Dhandapany, Shannon B Olsson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 241 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 60 | 25% |
| United States | 27 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 4% |
| Spain | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Greece | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| Japan | 3 | 1% |
| Mexico | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 105 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 180 | 75% |
| Scientists | 49 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 161 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 15% |
| Researcher | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Professor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 45 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 50 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 845. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#21,834
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#662
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#958
of 429,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#28
of 1,095 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,095 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.