↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Article Metrics

Evidence of tool use in a seabird

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
76 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
twitter
494 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
2 Redditors
Title
Evidence of tool use in a seabird
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2019
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1918060117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annette L. Fayet, Erpur Snær Hansen, Dora Biro

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 494 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1028. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,166
of 14,157,574 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#172
of 81,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182
of 232,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#7
of 700 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,157,574 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 81,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 700 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.