↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Predator-informed looming stimulus experiments reveal how large filter feeding whales capture highly maneuverable forage fish

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
23 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
136 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
reddit
5 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Predator-informed looming stimulus experiments reveal how large filter feeding whales capture highly maneuverable forage fish
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2019
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1911099116
Pubmed ID
Authors

David E. Cade, Nicholas Carey, Paolo Domenici, Jean Potvin, Jeremy A. Goldbogen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 136 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 22 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 40%
Environmental Science 6 7%
Engineering 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 26 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 294. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2021.
All research outputs
#119,190
of 25,503,365 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#2,529
of 103,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,668
of 478,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#64
of 938 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,503,365 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 938 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.