↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Article Metrics

Girls’ comparative advantage in reading can largely explain the gender gap in math-related fields

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
23 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
534 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Girls’ comparative advantage in reading can largely explain the gender gap in math-related fields
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2019
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1905779116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Breda, Clotilde Napp

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 534 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 25%
Student > Master 9 13%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 16%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 13%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Engineering 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 16 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 616. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2020.
All research outputs
#12,265
of 14,357,996 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#435
of 82,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#420
of 254,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#20
of 836 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,357,996 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 836 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.