| Title |
Electrically induced bacterial membrane-potential dynamics correspond to cellular proliferation capacity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1901788116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James P. Stratford, Conor L. A. Edwards, Manjari J. Ghanshyam, Dmitry Malyshev, Marco A. Delise, Yoshikatsu Hayashi, Munehiro Asally |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 27% |
| United States | 7 | 14% |
| Germany | 4 | 8% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 25 | 49% |
| Members of the public | 23 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 226 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 23% |
| Researcher | 38 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 10% |
| Unknown | 59 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 41 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 19 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 17 | 8% |
| Engineering | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 45 | 20% |
| Unknown | 63 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2022.
All research outputs
#488,565
of 25,634,695 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#8,556
of 103,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,802
of 364,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#181
of 986 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,634,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 986 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.