| Title |
Path-dependent institutions drive alternative stable states in conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1806852116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward W. Tekwa, Eli P. Fenichel, Simon A. Levin, Malin L. Pinsky |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 30% |
| Canada | 8 | 10% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Sweden | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Papua New Guinea | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 30 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 37 | 46% |
| Members of the public | 36 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 28% |
| Researcher | 20 | 16% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 29 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 20% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 35 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#398,562
of 25,534,033 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#7,164
of 103,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,704
of 444,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#137
of 889 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,534,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 889 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.