↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Genetically encodable bioluminescent system from fungi

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
384 Mendeley
Title
Genetically encodable bioluminescent system from fungi
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2018
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1803615115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexey A Kotlobay, Karen S Sarkisyan, Yuliana A Mokrushina, Marina Marcet-Houben, Ekaterina O Serebrovskaya, Nadezhda M Markina, Louisa Gonzalez Somermeyer, Andrey Y Gorokhovatsky, Andrey Vvedensky, Konstantin V Purtov, Valentin N Petushkov, Natalja S Rodionova, Tatiana V Chepurnyh, Liliia I Fakhranurova, Elena B Guglya, Rustam Ziganshin, Aleksandra S Tsarkova, Zinaida M Kaskova, Victoria Shender, Maxim Abakumov, Tatiana O Abakumova, Inna S Povolotskaya, Fedor M Eroshkin, Andrey G Zaraisky, Alexander S Mishin, Sergey V Dolgov, Tatiana Y Mitiouchkina, Eugene P Kopantzev, Hans E Waldenmaier, Anderson G Oliveira, Yuichi Oba, Ekaterina Barsova, Ekaterina A Bogdanova, Toni Gabaldón, Cassius V Stevani, Sergey Lukyanov, Ivan V Smirnov, Josef I Gitelson, Fyodor A Kondrashov, Ilia V Yampolsky

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 542 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 384 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 384 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 18%
Student > Bachelor 58 15%
Researcher 57 15%
Student > Master 41 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 4%
Other 45 12%
Unknown 99 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 113 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 18%
Chemistry 29 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 2%
Neuroscience 8 2%
Other 45 12%
Unknown 112 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 568. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#42,120
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,145
of 103,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#766
of 447,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#18
of 889 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 889 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.