↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Viable cyanobacteria in the deep continental subsurface

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
174 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
291 Mendeley
Title
Viable cyanobacteria in the deep continental subsurface
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2018
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1808176115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando Puente-Sánchez, Alejandro Arce-Rodríguez, Monike Oggerin, Miriam García-Villadangos, Mercedes Moreno-Paz, Yolanda Blanco, Nuria Rodríguez, Laurence Bird, Sara A. Lincoln, Fernando Tornos, Olga Prieto-Ballesteros, Katherine H. Freeman, Dietmar H. Pieper, Kenneth N. Timmis, Ricardo Amils, Víctor Parro

Abstract

Cyanobacteria are ecologically versatile microorganisms inhabiting most environments, ranging from marine systems to arid deserts. Although they possess several pathways for light-independent energy generation, until now their ecological range appeared to be restricted to environments with at least occasional exposure to sunlight. Here we present molecular, microscopic, and metagenomic evidence that cyanobacteria predominate in deep subsurface rock samples from the Iberian Pyrite Belt Mars analog (southwestern Spain). Metagenomics showed the potential for a hydrogen-based lithoautotrophic cyanobacterial metabolism. Collectively, our results suggest that they may play an important role as primary producers within the deep-Earth biosphere. Our description of this previously unknown ecological niche for cyanobacteria paves the way for models on their origin and evolution, as well as on their potential presence in current or primitive biospheres in other planetary bodies, and on the extant, primitive, and putative extraterrestrial biospheres.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 174 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 291 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 75 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 19%
Student > Bachelor 26 9%
Student > Master 21 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 37 13%
Unknown 62 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 16%
Environmental Science 37 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 7%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 75 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 310. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2022.
All research outputs
#111,051
of 25,507,011 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#2,384
of 103,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,169
of 354,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#45
of 976 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,507,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 976 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.