↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Article Metrics

Viable cyanobacteria in the deep continental subsurface

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
195 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
Title
Viable cyanobacteria in the deep continental subsurface
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2018
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1808176115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando Puente-Sánchez, Alejandro Arce-Rodríguez, Monike Oggerin, Miriam García-Villadangos, Mercedes Moreno-Paz, Yolanda Blanco, Nuria Rodríguez, Laurence Bird, Sara A. Lincoln, Fernando Tornos, Olga Prieto-Ballesteros, Katherine H. Freeman, Dietmar H. Pieper, Kenneth N. Timmis, Ricardo Amils, Víctor Parro

Abstract

Cyanobacteria are ecologically versatile microorganisms inhabiting most environments, ranging from marine systems to arid deserts. Although they possess several pathways for light-independent energy generation, until now their ecological range appeared to be restricted to environments with at least occasional exposure to sunlight. Here we present molecular, microscopic, and metagenomic evidence that cyanobacteria predominate in deep subsurface rock samples from the Iberian Pyrite Belt Mars analog (southwestern Spain). Metagenomics showed the potential for a hydrogen-based lithoautotrophic cyanobacterial metabolism. Collectively, our results suggest that they may play an important role as primary producers within the deep-Earth biosphere. Our description of this previously unknown ecological niche for cyanobacteria paves the way for models on their origin and evolution, as well as on their potential presence in current or primitive biospheres in other planetary bodies, and on the extant, primitive, and putative extraterrestrial biospheres.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 195 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 178 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 47 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 22%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Master 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 28%
Environmental Science 32 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 3%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 32 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 315. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2020.
All research outputs
#45,282
of 15,114,855 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,157
of 84,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,535
of 274,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#38
of 945 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,114,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 945 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.