↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Global nutrient transport in a world of giants

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
79 news outlets
blogs
15 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
224 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
303 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
916 Mendeley
Title
Global nutrient transport in a world of giants
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2015
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1502549112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher E. Doughty, Joe Roman, Søren Faurby, Adam Wolf, Alifa Haque, Elisabeth S. Bakker, Yadvinder Malhi, John B. Dunning, Jens-Christian Svenning

Abstract

The past was a world of giants, with abundant whales in the sea and large animals roaming the land. However, that world came to an end following massive late-Quaternary megafauna extinctions on land and widespread population reductions in great whale populations over the past few centuries. These losses are likely to have had important consequences for broad-scale nutrient cycling, because recent literature suggests that large animals disproportionately drive nutrient movement. We estimate that the capacity of animals to move nutrients away from concentration patches has decreased to about 8% of the preextinction value on land and about 5% of historic values in oceans. For phosphorus (P), a key nutrient, upward movement in the ocean by marine mammals is about 23% of its former capacity (previously about 340 million kg of P per year). Movements by seabirds and anadromous fish provide important transfer of nutrients from the sea to land, totalling ∼150 million kg of P per year globally in the past, a transfer that has declined to less than 4% of this value as a result of the decimation of seabird colonies and anadromous fish populations. We propose that in the past, marine mammals, seabirds, anadromous fish, and terrestrial animals likely formed an interlinked system recycling nutrients from the ocean depths to the continental interiors, with marine mammals moving nutrients from the deep sea to surface waters, seabirds and anadromous fish moving nutrients from the ocean to land, and large animals moving nutrients away from hotspots into the continental interior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 224 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 916 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 892 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 162 18%
Student > Master 151 16%
Researcher 129 14%
Student > Bachelor 126 14%
Other 41 4%
Other 137 15%
Unknown 170 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 307 34%
Environmental Science 246 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 59 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 2%
Social Sciences 11 1%
Other 63 7%
Unknown 209 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 865. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2024.
All research outputs
#21,105
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#647
of 103,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194
of 296,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#14
of 883 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 883 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.