RT @omlazo: Dejo este para el final porque es una joya, bien modelado y argumentado. De altísimo impacto. El paper de Steffen et al. (2018)…
RT @omlazo: Dejo este para el final porque es una joya, bien modelado y argumentado. De altísimo impacto. El paper de Steffen et al. (2018)…
RT @omlazo: Dejo este para el final porque es una joya, bien modelado y argumentado. De altísimo impacto. El paper de Steffen et al. (2018)…
RT @omlazo: Dejo este para el final porque es una joya, bien modelado y argumentado. De altísimo impacto. El paper de Steffen et al. (2018)…
@fredegar_bolger Será que no soy científico y por eso me acojoné cuando leí sobre tipping points y tipping cascades... Pero supongo que PNAS publica cualquier cosa... https://t.co/2M9C9pPpAl
RT @omlazo: Dejo este para el final porque es una joya, bien modelado y argumentado. De altísimo impacto. El paper de Steffen et al. (2018)…
RT @omlazo: Dejo este para el final porque es una joya, bien modelado y argumentado. De altísimo impacto. El paper de Steffen et al. (2018)…
RT @omlazo: Dejo este para el final porque es una joya, bien modelado y argumentado. De altísimo impacto. El paper de Steffen et al. (2018)…
RT @omlazo: Dejo este para el final porque es una joya, bien modelado y argumentado. De altísimo impacto. El paper de Steffen et al. (2018)…
RT @omlazo: Dejo este para el final porque es una joya, bien modelado y argumentado. De altísimo impacto. El paper de Steffen et al. (2018)…
RT @omlazo: Dejo este para el final porque es una joya, bien modelado y argumentado. De altísimo impacto. El paper de Steffen et al. (2018)…
RT @omlazo: Dejo este para el final porque es una joya, bien modelado y argumentado. De altísimo impacto. El paper de Steffen et al. (2018)…
Dejo este para el final porque es una joya, bien modelado y argumentado. De altísimo impacto. El paper de Steffen et al. (2018) argumenta sobre lo urgente de las acciones de mitigación para evitar un desequilibrio sistémico del sistema terrestre. https://t
@DoctorOoti @wilstjohn @Bishop4House @Grellsdain @ChiaroxOscuro @Bob_Nevada @PretColette @CNN This is a good a updated summary: "Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene". Steffen et al. 2018. PNAS. https://t.co/uw9G0zAH8W. You're welcome.
@ChimicoScettico Ma ci rendiamo conto di che razza di paper pubblica sta gente ? I tre porcellini di mia nipote ha decisamente più rigore scientifico. https://t.co/jXLbqXkYSg
@dwallacewells @ElizKolbert @GretaThunberg Love @ElizKolbert's reporting on #climate in @NewYorker & "Field Notes From a Catastrophe." Alas, this may not be true: "At no point will it cease to matter how much #carbon goes into the air, how much stays
‘Collective human action is required to steer the Earth System away from a potential threshold and stabilize it in a habitable interglacial-like state.’ #HothouseEarth https://t.co/K86H69dFII
منابع: 1) https://t.co/xgSwTzdb2a 2) https://t.co/SEqtASpiul 3) https://t.co/IqulvzoruQ
Refs: ClimateAction# Q&A blog pg: https://t.co/oNxn0U5zlW Global Carbon Budget Project: https://t.co/2ODpR9U3xo ONC CDR Modeling Project: https://t.co/H5yuwtdwz8 PNAS Tipping Point Paper:https://t.co/DWSPp9981m NOAA RF 1.9:https://t.co/mDwp7wXDGY Drawd
3.2/For CDR to be successful, we need to get to emission neutral and practice removal to stop the planet from warming enough to set off the tipping points https://t.co/zGqZrW7OUp.
A fascinating read. But given the many variables, their unquantifiable relationships to each other, I'd give ZERO probability any model could predict results out ten years. Add that we will not even do the easy stuff - e.g. nuclear power. Conclusion: hop
Speciellt om de säger ”det finns motstridande uppgifter om klimatpåverkan” och hänvisar till en tweet av Joppe från Bröhult och helt ignorerar https://t.co/aJiEvcu77X och liknande forskning.
"I won't change my meat eating habits to fight climate change!" We no longer have the luxury of avoiding inconveniences, we must do all that we can to ensure a future for our kids and grand kids. https://t.co/YOE5EDU037
La soglia dei 2' C non è un numero magico ed è un limite forse eccessivamente pericoloso per la nostra sopravvivenza. Per esempio questo articolo pubblicato su PNAS: 👇👇 https://t.co/OdnapmZHHx @lavoceinfo
@JimRose69872629 @thejuicemedia @RichardTol @OECD Yes Jimmy. I know you read what economists write. And virtually nothing else. Read some climate scientists for a change and then get back to me https://t.co/ERurRp8kKQ https://t.co/e4iG5LTCbH
@JimRose69872629 @thejuicemedia @RichardTol @OECD Yes Jimmy, this is precisely the rubbish "economics of climate change" that economists are publishing under the IPCC banner, while real climate scientists warn of ecological collapse at 2K warming. Thanks f
@Unicorn36902 Here is a paper on what can happen if we don't act quickly. We could face 1000 years of runaway heating: https://t.co/YOE5EDU037
RT @HelmanDaniel: Important article by Steffen et al. showing a possible sudden 5° warming from feedbacks in the climate system. Summary:…
RT @HelmanDaniel: Important article by Steffen et al. showing a possible sudden 5° warming from feedbacks in the climate system. Summary:…
Important article by Steffen et al. showing a possible sudden 5° warming from feedbacks in the climate system. Summary: https://t.co/cAig9IvPJ8 Original Article: https://t.co/K0aH1H0peY #ClimateStrike #ClimateChange #ClimateEmergency #IPCC #Research #sc
@past_is_future Yes, "Hothouse Earth." At some point, amplifying feedback overtakes other drivers. 3 decades after Dr. Hansen's testimony, humans continue accelerating CO2 pollution. Franzen's right about that, even if we can't tell exactly where the tippi
Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene | PNAS https://t.co/3XICl9uXO6
Trajectories Ecosystem disruptions, outcomes of which is driving my project on a @GenomeCanada funded @GENICE_CANADA #arctic #meltingseaice #climateemergency #greenhousegases https://t.co/bVroNSeC0t
Researchers have found that without major interventions to curb emissions, global warming could be stuck in a frightening feedback loop before eventually stabilizing. https://t.co/lzkIIFFPRc
@MRobertsQLD Have a read dipshit. https://t.co/bih3uhQvkk
@DesiScience_ @stevebhyve @Heena_J44 See here for more peer-reviewed science. https://t.co/SHQSMsGGM0
RT @anlomedad: @HalleVerkehrt @TerliWetter Will Steffen, das ist nicht irgendwer. Sondern der erstgenannte Autor in "meinem Erweckungsartik…
@HalleVerkehrt @TerliWetter Will Steffen, das ist nicht irgendwer. Sondern der erstgenannte Autor in "meinem Erweckungsartikel" https://t.co/lBOGmAUvLB "Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene" Wo auch dieses Zitat raus stammt⬇️. "Widespread,
Sul rischio di entrare in una condizione di "Hothouse Earth" https://t.co/ffOM56Wv39
@ObservatoireUS @MichaelEMann @c4tuna31 @cleantechnica Try this recent Steffen et al. paper: https://t.co/A1ewqOo6c6.
@DoctorVive @NewYorker @helixclimate 1/ You're moving the goalposts. It not a question of runaway hothouse warming. All we need is enough warming to collapse our industrial agriculture system. 2/ Tipping point risks begin at 1.5C says 16 authors of this pa
Tipping cascades that kick in from 1-3C warming? Yes says this paper https://t.co/KF90lJh1IJ @DoctorVive https://t.co/94Yvb1L4oB
@BarryJWoods @DrEmilyGrossman @richardabetts @edhawkins This one https://t.co/7rc5xxgbqh. So it's important to distinguish whether XR ever over-hype the science (occasionally happens with such a disparate group) vs whether the science itself is sound
@Ronchas_4 @gatobombay @Fierrazo3 @carolaurrejola @pazgonzalezm Los únicos viejos son los negacionistas climáticos que me han mostrado ustedes. Varios ya estiraron la pata. Acá tienes un paper de "décadas atras" con sus "leseras de estudios desfasados". Ch
@DoctorVive @NewYorker Just so's people have a different take on this to look into: https://t.co/U8wPVsGb9Q
RT @tan123: F is for the most massive scientific Fraud in human history. https://t.co/ZGIV7vUXNU
@anti_minotaur @AckKaero @do_you_cli_fi_ There is some support. But not a consensus, and not a reason not to pursue mitigation. https://t.co/mQx2aubzC2
@halvorz @itsbirdemic @wannabegroncho Bruh read scientific literature https://t.co/dDpPOAOfro
@strmsn Was hältst Du von meinem Text in grün? Das andere ist von https://t.co/lBOGmAUvLB "Rapid and fundamental" sagen die. Individuen >müssen< ja die Verzögerung in Regierungshandeln auffangen, um die 1.5˚Kurve abzubilden: Co2 muss 2020 peaken. 2
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
@Knutti_ETH @HalleVerkehrt @Wochenzeitung "Klimapanik" gibt es als Begriff nur in der Sprachwelt der BigOil-Aktionäre, ihrer bezahlten Handlanger und absoluten Dumpfbacken. Den Absatz im Bild einfach mal laut lesen und auf der Zunge zergehen lassen. Peer
@KHayhoe As layperson I found my wake-up call in August 2018 "Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene". So bluntly put and coming peer-reviewed from scientists? Huargh! https://t.co/lBOGmAUvLB But what if I had read this 10 yrs earlier without
https://t.co/VlSWUUrusc Trajectories of the Earth System in Anthropocene: RISK SELF-REINFORCING FEEDBACKS pushing Earth System planetary threshold if crossed prevent climate stabilization causing continued warming “HOTHOUSE EARTH” PATH EVEN HUMAN EMISSIONS
@gabygh13 @eine_Biene @CatInChief @Heiii Wie weit seid Ihr denn mit dem #TellTheTruth u seid Ihr bereit, den Lebenswandel von heut auf morgen zu ändern? Konsum total sein zu lassen? Das ist gemeint mit "rapid and fundamental", das die Scientists im August
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
RT @skeapspeaks: Whatever you're doing, you won't be doing it for much longer... https://t.co/l9MyrkBMUg
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
RT @skeapspeaks: Whatever you're doing, you won't be doing it for much longer... https://t.co/l9MyrkBMUg
RT @skeapspeaks: Whatever you're doing, you won't be doing it for much longer... https://t.co/l9MyrkBMUg
RT @skeapspeaks: Whatever you're doing, you won't be doing it for much longer... https://t.co/l9MyrkBMUg
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
@BendlerBlogger Zitat https://t.co/lBOGmACUn1 vom August 2018. Bisher beutet "mehr Jobs"= mehr Geld mehr Handel mehr Emission. Das geht die nä 15 Jahre nicht. Um die Kurve kalkulierbar einzuhalten, muss zB Herstellung v Autos auf 0, um Co2 von Stahlherste
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
RT @Cedders68: @kevpluck @GretaThunberg Also such claims seem to ignore year to date: https://t.co/PoQEQbSKwi https://t.co/eXMsbA3FGI Fire…
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
Happy Friday
RT @skeapspeaks: Whatever you're doing, you won't be doing it for much longer... https://t.co/l9MyrkBMUg
the next time someone asks me when i'm getting pregnant, i will show them this map
RT @skeapspeaks: Whatever you're doing, you won't be doing it for much longer... https://t.co/l9MyrkBMUg
This is what we have to prevent at all costs if you believe the next generation (and you if you plan to reach old age) should live or die.
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
RT @skeapspeaks: Whatever you're doing, you won't be doing it for much longer... https://t.co/l9MyrkBMUg
Whatever you're doing, you won't be doing it for much longer...
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
@kevpluck @GretaThunberg Also such claims seem to ignore year to date: https://t.co/PoQEQbSKwi https://t.co/eXMsbA3FGI Fires are started by people illegally, eventually benefitting rich ranchers. But that's missing the big picture of the 'dieback' feedbac
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…
RT @julian0liver: Heads up it's presently 409ppm atmospheric CO2, & that 450ppm (~2C) is understood as the point of no-return, after which…