@tadsweetwater @BernieSanders "This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016." https://t.co/0tJ6SqwHQX
@tadsweetwater @pierce_alonzo @BernieSanders "This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016." https://t.co/0tJ6SqwHQX
@a473629 @bourgeoisalien @tadsweetwater @BernieSanders "This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016." https://t.co/0tJ6SqwH
@tadsweetwater @BernieSanders "This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016." https://t.co/0tJ6SqwHQX
@davidharsanyi I don't think you are serious, but nevertheless here are a couple - https://t.co/bH0vqJ1lBN https://t.co/GtCCBpxmRC Good luck and I hope that helps you understand mixed economies.
@Original_Shroom @sullydish @CHSommers This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016. https://t.co/RQMkLGbs1D
@Accelerate_us @sullydish https://t.co/RQMkLGbs1D This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016. I tell you what, you never ta
@sullydish @MaxBoot This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016. https://t.co/RQMkLGbs1D
@LawoftheGator @molratty https://t.co/RQMkLGbs1D This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–16. it would be nice if you actually
@molratty This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016. https://t.co/RQMkLGbs1D sorry about your father but get the basic fac
@molratty Uhm, what's so hard to understand? Those patents wouldn't have happened without NIH-funded, public, basic research. The R&D was done by taxpayers, the clinical tests driven by Big Pharma. Lots of studies on this: https://t.co/HZNJX5zIp0
@molratty @meg_in_richmond Recognizing the value of research, and the lives saved, doesn’t require ignoring the source of funding. https://t.co/Xe5Dg8qfzo
um argumento no mesmo sentido é de que simplesmente TODAS, 100% das pesquisas de que originaram novas drogas nos EUA entre 2010-2016 foram financiadas ao menos parcialmente pelo contribuinte (via NIH) https://t.co/bcTZinIbSt
RT @jadler1969: @HeyMr_W This is the study that comes closest to supporting your argument, but it still doesnt get to the actual claim you…
@HeyMr_W This is the study that comes closest to supporting your argument, but it still doesnt get to the actual claim you made (and not particularly close either) https://t.co/6LHfH30GXU
Azar emphasizes the importance of private sector investment. But pharma is heavily subsidized by taxpayer funded research. Every new pharmaceutical on market bw 2010-2016 had numerous publicly funded research studies that helped establish it as a target. h
You left out the word partially
@JoeBanner13 It’s not false you can read it here https://t.co/b1FNTpoobm
@MyMine1001 @Russon93 @PattyJo30380657 @james_dasher @BridgetPhetasy Taxpayers have funded every new drug that has come to market since 2010 https://t.co/IcnfegSdWI
And drug companies free-ride on publicly-funded research https://t.co/qpeWoX6UOk while 'citizens often pay twice' https://t.co/l5i3R0q6pU
@dubbldigits @andycarpenter00 @dpakman How many times do I have to explain your misleading information. https://t.co/tPZrRJIdlx
RT @SciIndustry: NIH funds basic research underlying all new drugs https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l. Cuts in funding will compromise the future of i…
RT @SciIndustry: NIH funds basic research underlying all new drugs https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l. Cuts in funding will compromise the future of i…
RT @SciIndustry: NIH funds basic research underlying all new drugs https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l. Cuts in funding will compromise the future of i…
NIH funds basic research underlying all new drugs https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l. Cuts in funding will compromise the future of innovation and the industry.
Cuts to biomedical research will slow new cures; NIH funds research underlying every new drug https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l #BentleyUResearch
@jeversmma @benshapiro 1. Which cites an academic study: https://t.co/NwpsLYvnSv You didn't even try reading. You took one look and dismissed it. 2. They wouldn't have any money without medicare, since much of their population is on it. Hence no medicare,
@cultofdusty1 @FDinkelaker @blanks_constant Do you have a source on most innovation coming from private companies? Here's a study showing every drug since 2010 was funded by the government. https://t.co/BJ5ukrBxb3
@j32115597 @guccilibertaria @josheve81 @BernieSanders im not writing an essay my guy it's twitter. if you really want it that bad here: https://t.co/sklHs9yzBs
@UrHuckleberry20 @Hrodvlog @AM_ProHuman @vicenews @BernieSanders Is innovation reduced by single payer? Nah. Large parts of our drug innovation already come from NIH research and will continue to./2 https://t.co/3l6TEvQY7Z
RT @writersrepublic: The real jig is most of those R&D costs are covered by federally-subsidized NIH funds, which we provide so 🤷🏿♀️ https…
The real jig is most of those R&D costs are covered by federally-subsidized NIH funds, which we provide so 🤷🏿♀️ https://t.co/zYAk7WL40T
@PhRMA Thank goodness US taxpayers funded the NIH which researched the 210 drugs that came to market between 2010-16 according to a CISI study. Gotta love that taxpayer funded innovation! https://t.co/4AY0KjlPP1
@SmollestBella @Charalanahzard @BrewBloodPrince Source: https://t.co/KGXO9O6Zc4 Citation: Moses H 3rd, et al. (2015) The anatomy of medical research: US and international comparisons. JAMA 313:174–189.
@CrotalusLove @MikeBloomberg Here's a more scientific look at the issue: https://t.co/uwZR0xfefy
@pkicker2 @introvertgay Most doctors graduate from public universities and much of the basic research is done by the government... So it definitely isn't exclusively capitalism... All new approved drugs from 2010-2016 had public funding in research/develo
@MazzucatoM @rooseveltinst @ssworks @RoKhanna @RepAOC @repmarkpocan Oustanding analysis of https://t.co/shQZMJ1KTC "The State Helps Float Risky Medical #Research. Why Don't #Patents Benefit It?"
Outstanding article by Samir Malhotra on role of state investments in risky, #basicresearch on #drugdiscovery. Critical analysis based on #BentleyUResearch @sciindustry https://t.co/shQZMJ1KTC
@mrhoggs38 @mark9clinton @JFurKSL You have it backwards Mr Hoggs. Taxes fund the initial, risky research and the drug companies themselves come in at the end along with venture capitalists to finish it off. https://t.co/Htr6s3Pv9y
RT @bhemato: Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016 | PNAS https://t.co/hQAnttO0Dc
RT @bhemato: Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016 | PNAS https://t.co/hQAnttO0Dc
Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016 | PNAS https://t.co/hQAnttO0Dc
Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016 | PNAS https://t.co/EFFUdKnLxJ
“I know our study is frequently interpreted as, ‘the public sector developed these drugs,’ but they didn’t do it single-handedly...it’s an important distinction to make to acknowledge pharmaceutical companies’ role..." Dr. Ekaterina Cleary @SunTimes @Bentl
Dr. Ekaterina Cleary: “Government funding contributes to basic science that enables successful development. Obviously, without that basic research, you can’t develop the drug. ”https://t.co/NlE0eFW6sr @SunTimes #BentleyUResearch https://t.co/qKos316zil
@Golfergirl2018 @Phoenix_Firez Yes, as a taxpayer I helped fund research for all 210 FDA approved drugs in this 6 year span. So about all those profits..... https://t.co/esxRMxsrbW
@BlueLionBlog @jjfox123 And the NIH funded >$100B and all of the last 210 FDA approved drugs. The justification that all that profit is for pharma R&D is shaky at best. https://t.co/knM0firPWh
RT @rooseveltinst: @MomsRising A7: One study found that all 210 drugs approved between 2010 and 2016 were rooted, in whole or in part, on N…
RT @rooseveltinst: @MomsRising A7: One study found that all 210 drugs approved between 2010 and 2016 were rooted, in whole or in part, on N…
@MomsRising A7: One study found that all 210 drugs approved between 2010 and 2016 were rooted, in whole or in part, on National Institute of Health-funded research. 2/ https://t.co/jYGseFyqbG #WellnessWed #LowerDrugPricesNow #PeopleOverPharma
RT @JSheltzer: Taking a step back: about a quarter of all new drugs are discovered in academia (and then developed in partnership with biot…
RT @MattRasband: Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016 | PNAS https://t.co/0FHTm96Rbj
RT @JSheltzer: Taking a step back: about a quarter of all new drugs are discovered in academia (and then developed in partnership with biot…
RT @MattRasband: Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016 | PNAS https://t.co/0FHTm96Rbj
Great tweet of a critical study of scientific funding. Tax payer funded NIH dollars contributed to ALL of the new drugs approved from 2010-2016. ALL...
Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016 | PNAS https://t.co/0FHTm96Rbj
RT @JSheltzer: Taking a step back: about a quarter of all new drugs are discovered in academia (and then developed in partnership with biot…
RT @JSheltzer: Taking a step back: about a quarter of all new drugs are discovered in academia (and then developed in partnership with biot…
RT @JSheltzer: Taking a step back: about a quarter of all new drugs are discovered in academia (and then developed in partnership with biot…
RT @JSheltzer: Taking a step back: about a quarter of all new drugs are discovered in academia (and then developed in partnership with biot…
Taking a step back: about a quarter of all new drugs are discovered in academia (and then developed in partnership with biotech/pharma). Nearly all of this academic biomedical research is supported by the NIH https://t.co/WhQPZ9U3sr. https://t.co/45m7PZgzM
@jessdiritowhale @MarkAmodeiNV2 Public funding plays a major role in the research and development of new drugs. Of the 210 drugs approved by the FDA from 2010-2016, every single one was associated with NIH-funded research. https://t.co/ZEruY6IZab
US taxpayers contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016 https://t.co/lDb1boWAX5
@lone_state @Polisocius @TheDamageReport @EmmaVigeland @SenSanders How about the Trump administration? Trump too "left leaning" for you? $100 Billion of your tax dollars were spent during 6 years developing 210 drugs that pharmaceutical companies are now c
RT @matthewherper: @KHarris_98 @CrisprGuy @Kidfears99 See this study. NIH funding was involved in every single drug examined, but 90% of it…
@KHarris_98 @CrisprGuy @Kidfears99 See this study. NIH funding was involved in every single drug examined, but 90% of it went toward the basic science, not even the creation of the drug molecule. https://t.co/BT8DfF7O52
100% of all drugs approved by the FDA between 2010 and 2016 were funded by the US government. They then turn around and jack prices up while spending nearly all of their money on marketing. https://t.co/Pp5WsBmVb2 https://t.co/KLTmQuFUqg
@MiriamIrvine @muddshuvel @BernieSanders https://t.co/AVJF7cy7Ug https://t.co/WgZNaUISUL Here's 2 articles discussing use of public funds for pharma research. They do point out that it is common to only find the initial research of new drugs.
RT @spaekman: Please donate for #Yang2020 if you are able to. https://t.co/MvzQ4XztJr https://t.co/boXIbnUjxF Please review @AndrewYang's a…
@AndrewYang @McCormackJohn Here is the research you referenced. NIH contributed funding for basic or applied research underlying every drug approved 2010-2016. #BentleyUResearch @sciindustry @PNASNews https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l
RT @spaekman: Please donate for #Yang2020 if you are able to. https://t.co/MvzQ4XztJr https://t.co/boXIbnUjxF Please review @AndrewYang's a…
@Caligirl4Yang @AndrewYang Fair question. I'm not an expert, but here's what I found https://t.co/5kqZ4BFKq8
@bbcquestiontime Hey so this is a misleading and factually incorrect answer about the American drug development process. Most of the original research is funded by the US taxpayer, and then patented by pharmaceutical companies for profit. https://t.co/3Oqg
@_Matt_Hammond_ @Ethax @ryangrim @Cernovich @seanhannity The NIH funded in whole or in part every one of the 210 drugs that were approved by the FDA between 2010-2016. They know better. https://t.co/2Hsswrxr4T
@WiredUK Here is the evidence from pharmaceuticals: public sector research funding contributed to every new drug approved in the US 2010-2016 @PNASNews #BentleyUResearch #innovation @NIH https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l
@MazzucatoM Here is the evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Public sector (NIH) funds contributed to every new drug approved 2010-2016 - a $100 billion early investment in innovation and health #BentleyuResearch https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l
@GotMade @SenSanders I think you’re buying the line Pharma is selling. ( https://t.co/xC1LYn0VMv ) https://t.co/mztcucffxe
@BillWhitten13 @AndrewYang The basic research is funded by taxpayers (the NIH, primarily). The drugs that fail, fail during this round of funding. Additionally, the National Academy of Sciences already maintains project cost tables. "Cost" is already defin
not surprising.
RT @cmorten2: @NIH @PORTAL_Research and ICYMI, a 2018 paper shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with some s…
@NIH @PORTAL_Research and ICYMI, a 2018 paper shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with some stage of the development of EVERY SINGLE ONE of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA in 2010-16. https://t.co/M6jtp33FGJ
How Pharma Was Captured by the One Percent @NewRepublic "Pharma is not a business... in some imaginary free market." It rests on "a foundation of $33 billion in annual taxpayer-funded research." https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l #BentleyUResearch https://t.co/SvX