RT @innovationwonk: @jenngustetic @farooquema @sbirgov @TheStemCell @CynthiaSelin @SMorain @dsfeld (2) NIH contributed to just about every…
@jenngustetic @farooquema @sbirgov @TheStemCell @CynthiaSelin @SMorain @dsfeld (2) NIH contributed to just about every FDA approved drug: https://t.co/Rw3wSHjwXT
@jamezmarvin @LalehKhalili Every single vaccine/new drug stems from government research https://t.co/7cwVdXc57I
RT @skeletonpup: Most of my coworkers (including the pharmacists) held deeply incorrect beliefs about the price of medicines. "Companies ch…
RT @skeletonpup: Most of my coworkers (including the pharmacists) held deeply incorrect beliefs about the price of medicines. "Companies ch…
True for basically all pharmaceuticals: https://t.co/cBKmGgOBxJ
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: May be worth considering, as #Pharma enjoys obscene profits, its value. 93.5% drugs (and public $$ invested in all: ht…
RT @StevePhillipsMD: Sobering analysis of new drugs released over about a decade reinforces what we already knew. Little if any benefits…
Our work on @NIH funding for research leading to new drugs was referenced in three @Health_Affairs articles on drug pricing. NIH invested >$187 billion related to approvals 2010-2019, amount comparable to industry; yet, industry alone sets #drugprices h
RT @StevePhillipsMD: Sobering analysis of new drugs released over about a decade reinforces what we already knew. Little if any benefits…
RT @StevePhillipsMD: Sobering analysis of new drugs released over about a decade reinforces what we already knew. Little if any benefits…
RT @StevePhillipsMD: Sobering analysis of new drugs released over about a decade reinforces what we already knew. Little if any benefits…
RT @StevePhillipsMD: Sobering analysis of new drugs released over about a decade reinforces what we already knew. Little if any benefits…
RT @StevePhillipsMD: Sobering analysis of new drugs released over about a decade reinforces what we already knew. Little if any benefits…
@1IWillie1 @KyleKulinski Well it appears that that no new drugs are being developed already without government involvement so we may try cutting out big pharma. https://t.co/cuFerdUCW0
RT @StevePhillipsMD: Sobering analysis of new drugs released over about a decade reinforces what we already knew. Little if any benefits…
@NYJemM @DavidHenigUK Oh well, if it's a 'bit of a stretch' —since it's only lives in the developing world at stake—better not make such a stretch then. Really? And is this the hugely innovative system we have to harden our hearts to protect:
RT @StevePhillipsMD: Sobering analysis of new drugs released over about a decade reinforces what we already knew. Little if any benefits…
RT @StevePhillipsMD: Sobering analysis of new drugs released over about a decade reinforces what we already knew. Little if any benefits…
@AndrewCFollett Every single drug that was approved between 2010 - 2016 was the recipient of NIH funding, a real triumph for socialized medicine. We just privatize the profits and socialize the losses, rather than following the Norwegian model of collect
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: May be worth considering, as #Pharma enjoys obscene profits, its value. 93.5% drugs (and public $$ invested in all: ht…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: May be worth considering, as #Pharma enjoys obscene profits, its value. 93.5% drugs (and public $$ invested in all: ht…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: May be worth considering, as #Pharma enjoys obscene profits, its value. 93.5% drugs (and public $$ invested in all: ht…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: May be worth considering, as #Pharma enjoys obscene profits, its value. 93.5% drugs (and public $$ invested in all: ht…
RT @s_everson: In order to fend off criticisms of the UK govt's determination to uphold patents whatever the consequences of that for devel…
RT @s_everson: In order to fend off criticisms of the UK govt's determination to uphold patents whatever the consequences of that for devel…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: May be worth considering, as #Pharma enjoys obscene profits, its value. 93.5% drugs (and public $$ invested in all: ht…
RT @StevePhillipsMD: Sobering analysis of new drugs released over about a decade reinforces what we already knew. Little if any benefits…
RT @StevePhillipsMD: Sobering analysis of new drugs released over about a decade reinforces what we already knew. Little if any benefits…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: May be worth considering, as #Pharma enjoys obscene profits, its value. 93.5% drugs (and public $$ invested in all: ht…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: May be worth considering, as #Pharma enjoys obscene profits, its value. 93.5% drugs (and public $$ invested in all: ht…
RT @StevePhillipsMD: Sobering analysis of new drugs released over about a decade reinforces what we already knew. Little if any benefits…
RT @StevePhillipsMD: Sobering analysis of new drugs released over about a decade reinforces what we already knew. Little if any benefits…
RT @StevePhillipsMD: Sobering analysis of new drugs released over about a decade reinforces what we already knew. Little if any benefits…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: May be worth considering, as #Pharma enjoys obscene profits, its value. 93.5% drugs (and public $$ invested in all: ht…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: May be worth considering, as #Pharma enjoys obscene profits, its value. 93.5% drugs (and public $$ invested in all: ht…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: May be worth considering, as #Pharma enjoys obscene profits, its value. 93.5% drugs (and public $$ invested in all: ht…
RT @StevePhillipsMD: Sobering analysis of new drugs released over about a decade reinforces what we already knew. Little if any benefits…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: May be worth considering, as #Pharma enjoys obscene profits, its value. 93.5% drugs (and public $$ invested in all: ht…
RT @s_everson: In order to fend off criticisms of the UK govt's determination to uphold patents whatever the consequences of that for devel…
RT @StevePhillipsMD: Sobering analysis of new drugs released over about a decade reinforces what we already knew. Little if any benefits…
In order to fend off criticisms of the UK govt's determination to uphold patents whatever the consequences of that for developing countries, a string of Tory politicians have proclaimed how crucial it is to maintain innovation. This is what they're fightin
RT @StevePhillipsMD: Sobering analysis of new drugs released over about a decade reinforces what we already knew. Little if any benefits…
RT @StevePhillipsMD: Sobering analysis of new drugs released over about a decade reinforces what we already knew. Little if any benefits…
RT @StevePhillipsMD: Sobering analysis of new drugs released over about a decade reinforces what we already knew. Little if any benefits…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: May be worth considering, as #Pharma enjoys obscene profits, its value. 93.5% drugs (and public $$ invested in all: ht…
RT @StevePhillipsMD: Sobering analysis of new drugs released over about a decade reinforces what we already knew. Little if any benefits…
RT @StevePhillipsMD: Sobering analysis of new drugs released over about a decade reinforces what we already knew. Little if any benefits…
RT @StevePhillipsMD: Sobering analysis of new drugs released over about a decade reinforces what we already knew. Little if any benefits…
Sobering analysis of new drugs released over about a decade reinforces what we already knew. Little if any benefits over existing drugs, but they sure did ring in profits for pharma.
*all 210 drugs approved* in the U.S. between 2010 and 2016 benefitted from publicly-funded research, either directly or indirectly. All 210 drugs approved were funded by us. Capitalism is amazing https://t.co/ioDPv8IxsC
« Biological targets for drug action » euh
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: May be worth considering, as #Pharma enjoys obscene profits, its value. 93.5% drugs (and public $$ invested in all: ht…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: May be worth considering, as #Pharma enjoys obscene profits, its value. 93.5% drugs (and public $$ invested in all: ht…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: May be worth considering, as #Pharma enjoys obscene profits, its value. 93.5% drugs (and public $$ invested in all: ht…
May be worth considering, as #Pharma enjoys obscene profits, its value. 93.5% drugs (and public $$ invested in all: https://t.co/l5i3R0q6pU) over 10 yrs were “of minimal value, superfluous, no benefit but disadvantages or inadequately evaluated.” Not clear
#COVID19 showed us how much of @PhRMA's business model has not changed in reaping the rewards off of hefty patient/public investment: 1. @DataNinjaKat et al found that all 210 @US_FDA approved drugs from 2010-2016 had funding from @NIH (https://t.co/g2ss3
https://t.co/xwbk4qnrZd “NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016. Collectively, this research involved >200,000 yrs of grant funding totali
Pharma greases congress @ 2.4% of the entire NIH nutrition research funding budget. The NIH spent 888% more on drug research than nutrition research. https://t.co/Hgx0u7Axiu https://t.co/qOF780A9zH
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: Reminder that public funding (taxes) contributed to the published research assoc w/ *every* new drug approved by #FDA…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: Reminder that public funding (taxes) contributed to the published research assoc w/ *every* new drug approved by #FDA…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: Reminder that public funding (taxes) contributed to the published research assoc w/ *every* new drug approved by #FDA…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: Reminder that public funding (taxes) contributed to the published research assoc w/ *every* new drug approved by #FDA…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: Reminder that public funding (taxes) contributed to the published research assoc w/ *every* new drug approved by #FDA…
Reminder that public funding (taxes) contributed to the published research assoc w/ *every* new drug approved by #FDA 2010–2016: https://t.co/l5i3R0q6pU #Pharma's (claimed) "innovation" relies on *public* investment. @ColleenFuller @haronba @hemoglobalu
RT @peopleb4pharma: 3⃣ Taxpayers are the ones driving innovation of new drugs. "Most basic research is conducted through the National In…
RT @AnnaReettaK: @Geenimetsuri @JariJarvenpaa Lisäksi jos mennään vielä pidemmälle, lääkeyhtiöiden rokote- ja lääketutkimus hyödyntää yleen…
Honored to have @BentleyUResearch quoted @TheNation https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l
RT @peopleb4pharma: 3⃣ Taxpayers are the ones driving innovation of new drugs. "Most basic research is conducted through the National In…
RT @peopleb4pharma: 3⃣ Taxpayers are the ones driving innovation of new drugs. "Most basic research is conducted through the National In…
3⃣ Taxpayers are the ones driving innovation of new drugs. "Most basic research is conducted through the National Institutes of Health, other government sources." https://t.co/XVN6yOzV9w
RT @AnnaReettaK: @Geenimetsuri @JariJarvenpaa Lisäksi jos mennään vielä pidemmälle, lääkeyhtiöiden rokote- ja lääketutkimus hyödyntää yleen…
@Geenimetsuri @JariJarvenpaa Lisäksi jos mennään vielä pidemmälle, lääkeyhtiöiden rokote- ja lääketutkimus hyödyntää yleensä mittavasti julkisesti rahoitettua perustutkimusta. Tämä unohtuu myös yleensä julkisesta keskustelusta. https://t.co/F2oVRcsnaV
3. @NIH has supported the underpinning research and development of nearly every FDA-approved drug in the last few decades https://t.co/Rw3wSHjwXT
@BachelorABC @Heineken_US Not really. The public sector funds a good portion. Leeches. https://t.co/E283PBlcbL
So much federally funded research has an impact; why choose one? NIH funding contributed to research on each drug approved over the past decade or its target, comprising >600,000 publications. PNASNews Can we nominate all of them?https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8
@aaas @GoldGooseAward @SciIndustry So much federally funded research has an impact; why choose one? NIH funding contributed to research on each drug approved over the past decade or its target, comprising >600,000 publications. @PNASNews Can we nominate
@NatRevDrugDisc Question: how much of this cost is being offloaded to the public sector? https://t.co/0NGoFykDXY
@Statins_Kill @NIHDirector @Covid19Crusher @Covid19Critical @SenateGOP @SenateDems @realDonaldTrump I'm still trying to figure out the drug approval process of the FDA-especially Emergency Use Authorization. The research is showing that FDA relies heavily
The US has to set price controls now, like every other western country. We can’t continue funding R&D for the entire world AND subsidizing their ability to buy cheap drugs. Here’s the research article with the data. https://t.co/tkw5P2AfCw. 6/6.
RT @KaminskiMed: If you just scratch the surface behind nearly every novel therapy, blockbuster or precision medicine drug you will find th…
RT @KaminskiMed: If you just scratch the surface behind nearly every novel therapy, blockbuster or precision medicine drug you will find th…
RT @KaminskiMed: If you just scratch the surface behind nearly every novel therapy, blockbuster or precision medicine drug you will find th…
RT @KaminskiMed: If you just scratch the surface behind nearly every novel therapy, blockbuster or precision medicine drug you will find th…
If you just scratch the surface behind nearly every novel therapy, blockbuster or precision medicine drug you will find the basic discovery , most frequently funded by the @NIH @NIHDirector #ScienceMatters https://t.co/PQPXfpxdTO
@bartnewland @scottjshapiro Drugs are the product of science and socialized capitalism. This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from
What better example of @JeffDSachs argument than the >$100 billion in basic science underlying the new drugs brought to market over the past decade by business https://t.co/kiT3K7V2ZT
@alexinlaw @Robot_Logic @venandtonic @intricate119 @Public_Citizen I've been looking into it a bit just now and from what I can gather, if I read this correctly, over 90% of research funding comes from taxpayer dollars through the NIH https://t.co/VqkLKOP
This is consistent with the fact that @NIH contributed over$100 billion for the basic science underlying every drug approved over the past decade https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l @PNASNews https://t.co/yteTgzix1n @INETeconomics
The point is: successful drug discovery/development by the private sector requires a prior, established foundation of publicly-funded basic science https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l @PNASNews https://t.co/5bpxagVg1f @INETeconomics
"Drug development has always operated in an ecosystem ... sustained by a mix of public and private funds. Publicly funded research often produces insights into biology that create the conditions for the development of new medicines" https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l
"The pharmaceutical industry has profited from billions of dollars in government scientific research without returning anything to the taxpayers" @Reuters quoting #BentleyUResearch https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l https://t.co/8UIY6KGY7f
@LucaSardo14 @Il_Vitruviano @MazzucatoM Questo e' un fatto "artificiale", ovvero una bugia vestita a festa. Se vuoi capire anche il ruolo NEGATIVO che lo stato gioca nel pharma, ecco alcune references https://t.co/UfCvTVdwBx https://t.co/ftHSDBWAoY https:/
@Jaydee_Old_Boy @AskASillyQuesti @lucliv77 @w41gy @jeremycorbyn @redsarah99 Much basic research is govt funded because of the risk but the majority is privately funded. https://t.co/8VphDc82Cr https://t.co/f9lSLmYzuw Fact not cowardly accusations.