↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Proteasomes tether to two distinct sites at the nuclear pore complex

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Proteasomes tether to two distinct sites at the nuclear pore complex
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2017
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1716305114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sahradha Albert, Miroslava Schaffer, Florian Beck, Shyamal Mosalaganti, Shoh Asano, Henry F Thomas, Jürgen M Plitzko, Martin Beck, Wolfgang Baumeister, Benjamin D Engel

Abstract

The partitioning of cellular components between the nucleus and cytoplasm is the defining feature of eukaryotic life. The nuclear pore complex (NPC) selectively gates the transport of macromolecules between these compartments, but it is unknown whether surveillance mechanisms exist to reinforce this function. By leveraging in situ cryo-electron tomography to image the native cellular environment of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, we observed that nuclear 26S proteasomes crowd around NPCs. Through a combination of subtomogram averaging and nanometer-precision localization, we identified two classes of proteasomes tethered via their Rpn9 subunits to two specific NPC locations: binding sites on the NPC basket that reflect its eightfold symmetry and more abundant binding sites at the inner nuclear membrane that encircle the NPC. These basket-tethered and membrane-tethered proteasomes, which have similar substrate-processing state frequencies as proteasomes elsewhere in the cell, are ideally positioned to regulate transcription and perform quality control of both soluble and membrane proteins transiting the NPC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 155 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 227 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 25%
Researcher 40 18%
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 4%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 44 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 103 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 20%
Neuroscience 8 4%
Chemistry 6 3%
Physics and Astronomy 3 1%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 52 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2022.
All research outputs
#408,639
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#7,301
of 103,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,084
of 447,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#138
of 922 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 922 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.