@JohnLeePettim13 These are interesting points. However the systematic way to analyze energy transition technologies is to use a LCA. Here a study by PNAS on why solar and wind are better options: https://t.co/us3QgPbO6m
@GabrieleGalas17 @HenryK_B_ A study by Hertwich et al 2014 clearly used appropriate regional energy generation figures. Not how I KEEP providing evidence and links. Why don't you ? https://t.co/pHXvjrdTiu https://t.co/G8IgzUtQJi
RT @AljosaSlamersak: @JKSteinberger @KetanJ0 @DrSimEvans @YaleClimateComm @GlobalEcoGuy Take a look at these articles by Arvensen et al.,…
@JKSteinberger @KetanJ0 @DrSimEvans @YaleClimateComm @GlobalEcoGuy Take a look at these articles by Arvensen et al., and Hertwich et al. May not be exactly what you are looking for but close enough I think. https://t.co/Zes05Jb0S2 https://t.co/alpx6E6tlf
@ShayCormac_1 @USA_Over_Party @chrisholly71 @Sen_JoeManchin This is a peer reviewed study (link from the NIH) that argues your above points as incorrect based on the evidence. https://t.co/pvjslkxDyA
RT @EdgarHertwich: @_HannahRitchie @UNEPIRP For a more complete picture of environmental impacts, please also see our paper in @PNASNews T…
@MartinRieu @_vsaw @_HannahRitchie OWID does not produce data. It aggregates and presents data produced elsewhere. In this case, this data is entirely based on UN report and a scientific paper published in PNAS. Links below. Your conspiracy theories are mi
@_HannahRitchie @UNEPIRP For a more complete picture of environmental impacts, please also see our paper in @PNASNews That work is based on original LCAs assembled by the multi-institution team of authors. https://t.co/vSPMTjFMG4 https://t.co/BEDhdAfQ3R
@_HannahRitchie @UNEPIRP see also @PNASNews https://t.co/vSPMTjXnxC All based on individual LCA studies of the technologies done by the multi-institution research team that I lead. https://t.co/TFL35eaMOk
@abak1371 @Borgeseshooon اثرات محیط زیستیشون بررسی شده قطعا. مثلا اینجا: https://t.co/sGPyN6jW2e دلایل اقتصادی البته توی این تحقیق لحاظ نشده
@reola__ Here you go. All your questions in one graph. From: https://t.co/QQYqKtsM3y I look forward to hearing from you. https://t.co/8NugT2hLvu
Iceland sold its green energy certificates abroad to make the money twice. Some research: Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies https://t.co/U1iJ0Knv7w
@LDJr12345 @tonydtig @alan_thawley @RayDenaro If you want to learn about the environmental impacts of the different electric generation you might as well look at this study. https://t.co/r2ujqeskUt Note that Coal and NG are significantly more wasteful comp
@m_outreach Massimo, lo studio https://t.co/vaJNHdidba dice: 'Material requirements per unit generation for low-carbon technologies can be higher than for conventional fossil generation: 11–40 times more copper for photovoltaic systems and 6–14 times more
@PrfChrisPainter @Ed_Miliband In theory yes but in practice a GND will ramp up fossil fuel consumption and mineral consumption. That's why Labour’s GND needs rather more than rhetorics but also a comprehensive life cycle impact assessment. https://t.co/cOi
@Ed_Miliband Any Green New Deal needs a comprehensive life cycle assessment https://t.co/cOiR86MM9h which will need to include the stark reminder that a Green New Deal will ramp up fossil fuel consumption and mineral consumption. https://t.co/QVxALLgJEY A
Plasterk: '...,dat het energie kost om ze [windturbines] te maken' =>Ja, het produceren van windturbines kost energie. Over de hele levenscyclus is de hoeveelheid fossiele energie die nodig is echter vele malen kleiner dan voor fossiele elektriciteit ht
RT @Vision23: Het fossiele energieverbruik voor stroom uit zonnepanelen in Europa is volgens wetenschappelijke studie van (Herwitch et al.)…
RT @Vision23: Het fossiele energieverbruik voor stroom uit zonnepanelen in Europa is volgens wetenschappelijke studie van (Herwitch et al.)…
RT @Vision23: Het fossiele energieverbruik voor stroom uit zonnepanelen in Europa is volgens wetenschappelijke studie van (Herwitch et al.)…
RT @Vision23: Het fossiele energieverbruik voor stroom uit zonnepanelen in Europa is volgens wetenschappelijke studie van (Herwitch et al.)…
RT @Vision23: Het fossiele energieverbruik voor stroom uit zonnepanelen in Europa is volgens wetenschappelijke studie van (Herwitch et al.)…
RT @Vision23: De studie van Herwitch et al. is trouwens uit 2014, dus wellicht scoort zon-pv inmiddels al weer flink beter... https://t.co/…
De studie van Herwitch et al. is trouwens uit 2014, dus wellicht scoort zon-pv inmiddels al weer flink beter...
RT @Vision23: Het fossiele energieverbruik voor stroom uit zonnepanelen in Europa is volgens wetenschappelijke studie van (Herwitch et al.)…
DIT:
RT @Vision23: Het fossiele energieverbruik voor stroom uit zonnepanelen in Europa is volgens wetenschappelijke studie van (Herwitch et al.)…
RT @Vision23: Het fossiele energieverbruik voor stroom uit zonnepanelen in Europa is volgens wetenschappelijke studie van (Herwitch et al.)…
RT @Vision23: Het fossiele energieverbruik voor stroom uit zonnepanelen in Europa is volgens wetenschappelijke studie van (Herwitch et al.)…
RT @Vision23: Het fossiele energieverbruik voor stroom uit zonnepanelen in Europa is volgens wetenschappelijke studie van (Herwitch et al.)…
RT @Vision23: Het fossiele energieverbruik voor stroom uit zonnepanelen in Europa is volgens wetenschappelijke studie van (Herwitch et al.)…
RT @Vision23: Het fossiele energieverbruik voor stroom uit zonnepanelen in Europa is volgens wetenschappelijke studie van (Herwitch et al.)…
Het fossiele energieverbruik voor stroom uit zonnepanelen in Europa is volgens wetenschappelijke studie van (Herwitch et al.) 15 keer lager dan voor kolenstroom. Voor windenergie is het zelfs een factor 60 tot 80 lager. https://t.co/327ySOJYjV https://t.co
@PIK_Climate @indecol @YaleFES @GunnarLuderer The new @NatureComms study is very much in line with the findings of our earlier study in @PNASNews, but comparing different options and adding interesting nuances on land use. Thank you to @andersarvesen @Thom
Looking forward to reading this article from @EdgarHertwich on “life-cycle assessment (LCA) of long-term, wide-scale implementation of electricity generation from renewable sources” https://t.co/OOl9S62V2v
RT @Science_Open: @cvfriede ‘Integrated life-cycle assessment of #electricity-supply scenarios confirms #global #environmental benefit of l…
@cvfriede ‘Integrated life-cycle assessment of #electricity-supply scenarios confirms #global #environmental benefit of low-#carbon technologies.’ an article in the #ScienceOpen collection '#RenewableEnergy - #Hydropower': https://t.co/YxhFJ0Zw5a #EarthOve
"only two years of current global copper and one year of iron production will suffice to build a low-carbon energy system capable of supplying the world's electricity needs in 2050" New paper in @PNASNews https://t.co/27PcGRu9pW #future #energy #netzero
RT @toinil: @alfholme @LaNaturenLeve @solves @tweetmyinbox @miljodir @faktisk_no Om IPPC ikke er god nok kilde for LNL: Studie som omfatter…
RT @toinil: @alfholme @LaNaturenLeve @solves @tweetmyinbox @miljodir @faktisk_no Om IPPC ikke er god nok kilde for LNL: Studie som omfatter…
RT @toinil: @alfholme @LaNaturenLeve @solves @tweetmyinbox @miljodir @faktisk_no Om IPPC ikke er god nok kilde for LNL: Studie som omfatter…
@alfholme @LaNaturenLeve @solves @tweetmyinbox @miljodir @faktisk_no Om IPPC ikke er god nok kilde for LNL: Studie som omfatter det meste, inkl arealbruk her: https://t.co/LPmYkbwuNq Senere oppdatert med fokus på CO2 og dynamikken over tid i en artikkel i
RT @hannon_matthew: For a policy wonk like me this is very useful. A comparison of energy technology performance across key indicators like…
For a policy wonk like me this is very useful. A comparison of energy technology performance across key indicators like carbon intensity, land occupation, particulate matter and raw material demand. Great way of comparing rival techs. @PNASNews https:/
RT @ThomasGibon: “There is no way to mitigate #climatechange without getting rid of #coal” D. Shindell from #IPCC #SR15 In fact virtually…
RT @ThomasGibon: “There is no way to mitigate #climatechange without getting rid of #coal” D. Shindell from #IPCC #SR15 In fact virtually…
RT @ThomasGibon: “There is no way to mitigate #climatechange without getting rid of #coal” D. Shindell from #IPCC #SR15 In fact virtually…
RT @ThomasGibon: “There is no way to mitigate #climatechange without getting rid of #coal” D. Shindell from #IPCC #SR15 In fact virtually…
RT @ThomasGibon: “There is no way to mitigate #climatechange without getting rid of #coal” D. Shindell from #IPCC #SR15 In fact virtually…
“There is no way to mitigate #climatechange without getting rid of #coal” D. Shindell from #IPCC #SR15 In fact virtually any other electricity generation option is preferable to coal, and not only regarding greenhouse gas emissions: https://t.co/d5ZknOEpF
RT @C_Coolidge: PNAS: Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms... https://t.co/m3HA2NKOH0
‘Integrated life-cycle assessment of #electricity-supply scenarios confirms global #environmental benefit of #lowcarbon #technologies’, an article in #ScienceOpen collection ‘#RenewableEnergy - #Hydropower’ by @cvfriede: #EarthOvershootDay #MoveTheDate htt
RT @Science_Open: ‘Integrated life-cycle assessment of #electricity-supply scenarios confirms global #environmental benefit of low-carbon t…
RT @Science_Open: ‘Integrated life-cycle assessment of #electricity-supply scenarios confirms global #environmental benefit of low-carbon t…
‘Integrated life-cycle assessment of #electricity-supply scenarios confirms global #environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies’ an article in #ScienceOpen collection ‘#Renewable Energy – #Hydropower’: #lowcarbon #environment https://t.co/YxhFJ0Zw5a
@LenkaKollar @Gen_Atomic @NREL About harmonizing #energy #data: 2016: Proposed Standards for Variable Harmonization Documentation and Referencing: A Case Study Using QuickCharmStats 1.1 https://t.co/lDIHz1L2Gx 2014:Nuclear energy excluded couldn't reconci
@AarneClimate @Peters_Glen @andersarvesen What you see as hoovering box plot to the right of the bar is in fact the range of results present in the current literature, reflecting either the past or current situation. See also https://t.co/vSPMTjXnxC http
@Neonomide @dugntyg @Daniel_W_See @gschivley Evidence? We've been looking at LCAs, including materials, all through this thread and none have actually concluded that. This study evaluated a straw-man ultra-high RE scenario and found it didn't pose a real p
@Neonomide @dugntyg @gschivley A little dated, but a good place to start. https://t.co/4cPLoBjwg0 More recent NREL work integrating/harmonizing other LCA: https://t.co/sYXI70YK1B For concerns re: material scarcity and impacts of high-RE scenarios https:
Integrated LCA of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies https://t.co/IE25qaMkNU
PNAS: Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms... https://t.co/m3HA2NKOH0
...global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies https://t.co/m3HA2NKOH0
Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carb https://t.co/DNdDC3yXzi
First in-depth life-cycle assessment confirms global environmental benefit of solar,wind&hydropower #greeneconomy https://t.co/NglLjOJXyy
Adding CCS to coal & gas plants reduces emissions, but increases all other environmental impacts (lower efficiency) https://t.co/U4UL4fwXyK
@UNFCCC @ClimateReality That is only directly. What about a life-cycle assessment perspective? Hint: RE still better http://t.co/Ezc7Zc5eB4
Recent research in PNAS by E Hertwich, G Heath, and colleagues: LCA environmental benefits of low-carbon electricity. http://t.co/un4jIW2oAK
Different electricity techs and their lifecycle impacts on environment. In one handy chart. http://t.co/N58NKlmogy http://t.co/eFBSaN6SAX
Different electricity techs and their lifecycle impacts on environment. In one handy chart. http://t.co/N58NKlmogy http://t.co/eFBSaN6SAX
Large-scale implementation of wind, PV and CSP has potential to halve environmental impacts of electricity production http://t.co/58d2oxSmqF
Large-scale implementation of wind, PV and CSP has potential to halve environmental impacts of electricity production http://t.co/58d2oxSmqF
Large-scale implementation of wind, PV and CSP has potential to halve environmental impacts of electricity production http://t.co/58d2oxSmqF
Global-scale #lifecycleassessment shows #renewable #energy "capable of supplying world's electricity needs by 2050" http://t.co/WZbRQDbsF7
Global-scale #lifecycleassessment shows #renewable #energy "capable of supplying world's electricity needs by 2050" http://t.co/WZbRQDbsF7
Another confirmation that clean energy is worth it! Look this recent PNAS paper up: http://t.co/XKoGEQkoMZ
Renewable energy passes a comprehensive life-cycle analysis versus conventional power sources http://t.co/yeb5aaKdGK .
@GreenpeaceUK @Greenpeace This in-depth tech lifetime impact study begs to differ. http://t.co/MeYpWHQTXh
Life-cycle assessment of wind, solar, & hydropower show benefits far outweigh costs http://t.co/vUIiUqGoFU #ClimateChange
PNAS. Integrated Life-Cycle Assessment of Electricity-Supply Scenarios Confirms Global Env. Benefit of Low-Carb Techn http://t.co/UbTxsoowsH
[1/2]...compared to conventional electricity. Its interesting to consider the different #environmental impacts http://t.co/CtLJv7DTIM
New @PNAS study: Lifecycle assessment compares #GHG & #environment impacts of #lowcarbon vs #fossilfuel electricity. http://t.co/CtLJv7DTIM
@Statkraft @DN_no @NTNU Takk for interessen! DN kan kreve betaling, men artikkelen er åpent tilgjengelig: http://t.co/GuVhoIQwwY …
Impacte ambiental d'infraestructures energies renovables és molt menor que seguir amb combustibles fòssils http://t.co/Ijfqjo2yhS
lifecycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies http://t.co/BzBvITlJoO
Erste umfassende Ökobilanz von den #Erneuerbaren im Unterschied zu #Fossil. http://t.co/Ele5EI03ac #energiewende
Erste umfassende Ökobilanz von den #Erneuerbaren im Unterschied zu #Fossil. http://t.co/Ele5EI03ac #energiewende
+++ Analisi ciclo di vita conferma beneficio ambientale globale delle tecnologie a basse emissioni di carbonio http://t.co/3dLF79vn6s
So, it looks like we can make the change to renewable energy infrastructure. Life-cycle analysis http://t.co/fApNhF0QNU
Erste umfassende Ökobilanz von den #Erneuerbaren im Unterschied zu #Fossil. http://t.co/Ele5EI03ac #energiewende
+++ Analisi ciclo di vita conferma beneficio ambientale globale delle tecnologie a basse emissioni di carbonio http://t.co/3dLF79vn6s
Integrated life-cycle #assessment of electricity-supply scenarios, environmental benefit of renewables http://t.co/pAXwCJEzqF via @PNASNews
Erste umfassende Ökobilanz von den #Erneuerbaren im Unterschied zu #Fossil. http://t.co/Ele5EI03ac #energiewende
Erste umfassende Ökobilanz von den #Erneuerbaren im Unterschied zu #Fossil. http://t.co/Ele5EI03ac #energiewende
Erste umfassende Ökobilanz von den #Erneuerbaren im Unterschied zu #Fossil. http://t.co/Ele5EI03ac #energiewende
Decarbonizing electricity generation would stabilize or reduce air & water pollution w/ doubling of energy production http://t.co/6aD6HM76ua
Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-... http://t.co/0LfDKiAwNU
Decarbonizing electricity generation would stabilize or reduce air & water pollution w/ doubling of energy production http://t.co/6aD6HM76ua