| Title |
The evolution of self-control
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1323533111 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Evan L. MacLean, Brian Hare, Charles L. Nunn, Elsa Addessi, Federica Amici, Rindy C. Anderson, Filippo Aureli, Joseph M. Baker, Amanda E. Bania, Allison M. Barnard, Neeltje J. Boogert, Elizabeth M. Brannon, Emily E. Bray, Joel Bray, Lauren J. N. Brent, Judith M. Burkart, Josep Call, Jessica F. Cantlon, Lucy G. Cheke, Nicola S. Clayton, Mikel M. Delgado, Louis J. DiVincenti, Kazuo Fujita, Esther Herrmann, Chihiro Hiramatsu, Lucia F. Jacobs, Kerry E. Jordan, Jennifer R. Laude, Kristin L. Leimgruber, Emily J. E. Messer, Antonio C. de A. Moura, Ljerka Ostojić, Alejandra Picard, Michael L. Platt, Joshua M. Plotnik, Friederike Range, Simon M. Reader, Rachna B. Reddy, Aaron A. Sandel, Laurie R. Santos, Katrin Schumann, Amanda M. Seed, Kendra B. Sewall, Rachael C. Shaw, Katie E. Slocombe, Yanjie Su, Ayaka Takimoto, Jingzhi Tan, Ruoting Tao, Carel P. van Schaik, Zsófia Virányi, Elisabetta Visalberghi, Jordan C. Wade, Arii Watanabe, Jane Widness, Julie K. Young, Thomas R. Zentall, Yini Zhao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 20% |
| Germany | 6 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 6% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Rwanda | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 47 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 61 | 64% |
| Scientists | 27 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,030 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Hungary | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Austria | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 1% |
| Unknown | 977 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 224 | 22% |
| Researcher | 158 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 131 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 127 | 12% |
| Professor | 47 | 5% |
| Other | 177 | 17% |
| Unknown | 166 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 310 | 30% |
| Psychology | 240 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 61 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 31 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 27 | 3% |
| Other | 147 | 14% |
| Unknown | 214 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 510. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
#50,811
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,314
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308
of 245,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#20
of 978 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 978 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.