Title |
A dynamical model of growth and maturation in Drosophila
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2023
|
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2313224120 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John J. Tyson, Amirali Monshizadeh, Stanislav Y. Shvartsman, Alexander W. Shingleton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
Researcher | 2 | 18% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
Professor | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 18% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 27% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 27% |
Computer Science | 2 | 18% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2024.
All research outputs
#392,437
of 25,161,628 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#7,079
of 102,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,460
of 319,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#92
of 705 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,161,628 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 705 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.