| Title |
Caught in the crossfire: Fears of Chinese–American scientists
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2216248120 |
| Authors |
Yu Xie, Xihong Lin, Ju Li, Qian He, Junming Huang |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 571 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 70 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 3% |
| Australia | 11 | 2% |
| Canada | 9 | 2% |
| China | 6 | 1% |
| Singapore | 6 | 1% |
| Japan | 5 | <1% |
| France | 5 | <1% |
| India | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 58 | 10% |
| Unknown | 382 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 530 | 93% |
| Scientists | 31 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | <1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 46% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 23% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 15% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 8% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 31% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 573. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2023.
All research outputs
#38,550
of 24,483,002 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,066
of 101,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#941
of 349,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#22
of 763 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,483,002 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 763 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.