| Title |
Caught in the crossfire: Fears of Chinese–American scientists
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2216248120 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yu Xie, Xihong Lin, Ju Li, Qian He, Junming Huang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 548 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 73 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 3% |
| Australia | 12 | 2% |
| Canada | 9 | 2% |
| China | 6 | 1% |
| Japan | 5 | <1% |
| Singapore | 5 | <1% |
| France | 5 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 55 | 10% |
| Unknown | 359 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 509 | 93% |
| Scientists | 28 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 35% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 30% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1514. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,888
of 25,836,587 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#253
of 103,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243
of 378,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#6
of 807 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,836,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 807 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.