↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Caught in the crossfire: Fears of Chinese–American scientists

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
144 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
537 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
5 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Caught in the crossfire: Fears of Chinese–American scientists
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2023
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2216248120
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Xie, Xihong Lin, Ju Li, Qian He, Junming Huang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 537 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 31%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 15%
Arts and Humanities 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 8%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Other 7 27%
Unknown 9 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1532. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2024.
All research outputs
#7,983
of 26,356,696 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#256
of 104,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243
of 384,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#6
of 808 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,356,696 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 808 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.