↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Caught in the crossfire: Fears of Chinese–American scientists

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
139 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
549 X users
reddit
5 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Caught in the crossfire: Fears of Chinese–American scientists
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2023
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2216248120
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Xie, Xihong Lin, Ju Li, Qian He, Junming Huang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 549 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 40%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 4 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 10%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Mathematics 1 5%
Other 6 30%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1496. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,874
of 25,393,071 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#255
of 103,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247
of 373,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#6
of 806 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,393,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 806 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.