| Title |
Impact of natural selection on global patterns of genetic variation and association with clinical phenotypes at genes involved in SARS-CoV-2 infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2123000119 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chao Zhang, Anurag Verma, Yuanqing Feng, Marcelo C. R. Melo, Michael McQuillan, Matthew Hansen, Anastasia Lucas, Joseph Park, Alessia Ranciaro, Simon Thompson, Meagan A. Rubel, Michael C. Campbell, William Beggs, Jibril Hirbo, Sununguko Wata Mpoloka, Gaonyadiwe George Mokone, Regeneron Genetic Center, Thomas Nyambo, Dawit Wolde Meskel, Gurja Belay, Charles Fokunang, Alfred K. Njamnshi, Sabah A. Omar, Scott M. Williams, Daniel J. Rader, Marylyn D. Ritchie, Cesar de la Fuente-Nunez, Giorgio Sirugo, Sarah A. Tishkoff, Abecasis Goncalo, Baras Aris, Cantor Michael, Coppola Giovanni, Economides Aris, Lotta Luca A., Overton John D., Reid Jeffrey G., Shuldiner Alan, Beechert Christina, Forsythe Caitlin, Fuller Erin D., Gu Zhenhua, Lattari Michael, Lopez Alexander, Overton John D., Schleicher Thomas D., Padilla Maria Sotiropoulos, Widom Louis, Wolf Sarah E., Pradhan Manasi, Manoochehri Kia, Ulloa Ricardo H., Banerjee Nilanjana, Cantor Michael, Li Dadong, Sharma Deepika, Bai Xiaodong, Balasubramanian Suganthi, Blumenfeld Andrew, Boutkov Boris, Eom Gisu, Habegger Lukas, Hawes Alicia, Khalid Shareef, Krasheninina Olga, Lanche Rouel, Mansfield Adam J., Maxwell Evan K., Nafde Mrunali, O’Keeffe Sean, Orelus Max, Panea Razvan, Polanco Tommy, Rasool Ayesha, Reid Jeffrey G., Salerno William, Staples Jeffrey C., Jones Marcus B., LeBlanc Michelle, Mitnaul Lyndon J. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 16% |
| India | 2 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| China | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 4% |
| Central African Republic | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 64% |
| Scientists | 7 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 21% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2023.
All research outputs
#435,308
of 25,468,708 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#7,767
of 103,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,553
of 444,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#167
of 803 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 803 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.