| Title |
Half of US population exposed to adverse lead levels in early childhood
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2118631119 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael J. McFarland, Matt E. Hauer, Aaron Reuben |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 723 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 235 | 33% |
| Canada | 27 | 4% |
| Germany | 11 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 1% |
| Australia | 8 | 1% |
| Spain | 7 | <1% |
| India | 6 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Comoros | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 46 | 6% |
| Unknown | 365 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 603 | 83% |
| Scientists | 88 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 20 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 56 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 22% |
| Unknown | 58 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3623. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,473
of 24,955,994 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#40
of 102,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72
of 434,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#2
of 922 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,955,994 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 922 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.